0411-7752349

Considering user request

The user shared a Chinese text about CIES's report stating that Manchester United's signings are the least cost-effective globally, with Real Madrid and PSG ranking higher. Since they didn't ask a specific question, it may be good to offer a concise summary and context regarding the report. It looks like I should clarify what the user is interested in—more details, an analysis, or the source. I’ll also be careful about ensuring accuracy, avoiding any mix-ups.Formulating response options

I can ask the user if they want a summary of the CIES report, explaining their methodology and typical standings. For example, Real Madrid often scores high for positive balance, while Manchester United faces criticism for their ROI. I can neatly ask if they want to see specific rankings or an interpretation of why Manchester United is ranked low, and offer reasons like high fees for underperforming signings or manager turnover. I'll keep the response clear and in Chinese with concise bullet points!Creating a concise summary

I’m putting together a brief interpretation of the CIES report on transfer value for money, focusing on how it measures the cost-effectiveness of transfers based on fees, salary amortization, and player contributions over the past five years. I’ll outline possible reasons for Manchester United’s low ranking, like premium signings and managerial turnover, while noting Real Madrid’s strengths with young talent and stable coaching. I also want to remind the user that specific rankings are based on the CIES report, and then ask what they’d like next!